2001-VIL-45-SC-DT
Equivalent Citation: [2001] 251 ITR 781, 170 CTR 557, 119 TAXMANN 782
Supreme Court of India
Civil Appeal No 3655 of 1998.
Date: 19.07.2001
KS. SUNDARAM
Vs
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
For the Appellant : Pratap Venugopal and K. J. John, Advocates
For the Respondent : Dr. V. Gauri Shankar, Senior Advocate ( Mrs. Lakshmi Iyengar and Ms. Sushma Suri, Advocates
BENCH
S. P. Bharucha, Y. K. Sabharwal And Brijesh Kumar JJ.
JUDGMENT
We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and read the judgment and order under challenge. We have also read the rule, which the High Court (see [1999] 239 ITR 851 (Mad)), has construed. In our view, the judgment of the High Court is unexceptionable.
The civil appeal is dismissed with costs.
DISCLAIMER: Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order accurately and correctly however the access, usage and circulation is subject to the condition that VATinfoline Multimedia is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions.