2001-VIL-45-SC-DT

Equivalent Citation: [2001] 251 ITR 781, 170 CTR 557, 119 TAXMANN 782

Supreme Court of India

Civil Appeal No 3655 of 1998.

Date: 19.07.2001

KS. SUNDARAM

Vs

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

For the Appellant : Pratap Venugopal  and  K. J. John, Advocates
For the Respondent : Dr. V. Gauri Shankar, Senior Advocate ( Mrs. Lakshmi Iyengar  and  Ms. Sushma Suri, Advocates

BENCH

S. P. Bharucha, Y. K. Sabharwal And Brijesh Kumar JJ.

JUDGMENT

We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and read the judgment and order under challenge. We have also read the rule, which the High Court (see [1999] 239 ITR 851 (Mad)), has construed. In our view, the judgment of the High Court is unexceptionable.

The civil appeal is dismissed with costs.

 

 

DISCLAIMER: Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order accurately and correctly however the access, usage and circulation is subject to the condition that VATinfoline Multimedia is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions.